|
What you don't like about MFB
|
| Dec 13 2008 12:30 PM | RE: What you don't like about MFB |
Post: #81
|
|
Blader Data
Joined: Sep 2008
Bey Points: 1000
|
Gonna have to agree with Brad on this one lol
|
||
|
|||
| Dec 13 2008 12:33 PM | RE: What you don't like about MFB |
Post: #82
|
|
Blader Data
Joined: Dec 2008
|
Im only 14 and i order online without my parents. You can buy visa gift cards now, works like a credit card but preloaded with money. Doesn't needed to be linked to your bank account or any billings. Perfect so if you do give away your card number accidently(Scam) you won't lose much.
btw - new beyblades although shiny look cool, has a better design and look. ![]()
|
||
|
|||
| Dec 13 2008 01:47 PM | RE: What you don't like about MFB |
Post: #83
|
|
Blader Data
Joined: Jun 2008
Bey Points: 1000
|
The looks are only a question of taste. But I really like MFB for looks. I also really enjoy the excitement from the fact that nobody knows how new releases will fare in the game.
|
||
|
|||
| Dec 15 2008 09:07 PM | RE: What you don't like about MFB |
Post: #84
|
|
Blader Data
Joined: Oct 2008
Bey Points: 1000
|
(Dec 12 2008 10:17 PM)Bey Brad Wrote: Um, MFB aren't much smaller than plastics and they're slightly larger than HMS. oh, at one point information said they were slightly smaller than HMS. thats why i said the stuff about size
|
||
|
|||
| Dec 22 2008 05:03 AM | RE: What you don't like about MFB |
Post: #85
|
|
Blader Data
Joined: Oct 2007
Bey Points: 1000
|
I've been thinking more about the loss of Weight Disks, and it becomes increasingly more apparent to me that it's really not that big of a deal.
In HMS they really weren't that useful, either. You chose between Circle Heavy or Circle Wide (nobody used Circle Balance) and that was basically it. Then CWDs came out, but there was only one metal CWD, and therefore differentiation there was based on the plastic part. Examining the structure of MFB, it would be incredibly easy to insert a fourth layer between the Track and Bottom. I don't think it would be possible to use the current Track shape, but that's not much of a surprise. In the end, the loss of the WD is only noticeable because these things are really, really top heavy. Inevitably, when we start to see some metal Bottoms introduced I think this will help to alleviate the issue. As I'd stated earlier, Faces with metal cores would be useful, and metal weighted tracks and bottoms are just an inevitability. ![]() |
||
|
|||
| Dec 22 2008 04:04 PM | RE: What you don't like about MFB |
Post: #86
|
|
Blader Data
Joined: Jul 2008
Bey Points: 1000
|
(Dec 22 2008 05:03 AM)Bey Brad Wrote: Examining the structure of MFB, it would be incredibly easy to insert a fourth layer between the Track and Bottom. I don't think it would be possible to use the current Track shape, but that's not much of a surprise. I could see a Track built similar to the D125 Track, but with a metal, removable weight disc. That wouldn't change the Track structure too much, and if the metal disc could be removed and replaced with a different-sized one, this Track would be very useful. Unless it was a 145 Track, but still. |
||
|
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|


Blader Data



![[Image: Taikitop.png]](http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee117/Taiki1994/Taikitop.png)
![[Image: wbobanner.png]](http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b205/deuzma/wbobanner.png)